Hepatorenal syndrome
Definition
Development of renal failure in patients with severe liver disease (acute or chronic)
In the absence of any other identifiable cause of renal pathology
Risk Factors
Strong
Advanced cirrhosis
Ascites
Alcoholic hepatitis
Acute liver failure
Hyponatraemia
High plasma renin activity (PRA)
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
Weak
Large volume paracentesis
GI bleeding
Differential diagnosis
Epidemiology
The probability of developing HRS in patients with cirrhosis is approximately 40% in 5 years
It occurs in 4% of patients admitted with decompensated cirrhosis
Aetiology
HRS may develop spontaneously in patients with cirrhosis
No objective criteria for a precipitating event other than progressive liver failure
May also develop in other chronic liver diseases associated with severe liver failure and portal hypertension
Alcoholic hepatitis
Acute liver failure
Cirrhosis is most commonly a result of infectious hepatitis or chronic alcoholism
Independent predictive factors of HRS occurrence are:
Low serum sodium concentration
High plasma renin activity
Clinical features
Key features:
Advanced cirrhosis (common)
Jaundice (common)
Ascites (common)
Other diagnostic factors
Moderate lowering of BP (common)
Peripheral oedema (common)
Hepatosplenomegaly (common)
Spider angioma (common)
Oliguria (uncommon)
Bruising (uncommon)
Petechiae (uncommon)
Palmar erythema (uncommon)
Scratch marks (uncommon)
Gynaecomastia (uncommon)
Encephalopathy (uncommon)
Pruritus (uncommon)
Confusion (uncommon)
Drowsiness (uncommon)
Pathophysiology
Four primary factors are involved in the pathophysiology of HRS:
Systemic vasodilation
Leads to a moderate lowering of blood pressure
Activation of the sympathetic nervous system
Leads to renal vasoconstriction and altered renal autoregulation
Causes renal blood flow to be much more dependent on mean arterial pressure
Relative impairment of cardiac function
Although cardiac output may increase, it cannot increase adequately to maintain blood pressure
In cirrhosis, this is termed cirrhotic cardiomyopathy
Increased formation of renal vasoconstrictors
Thromboxane A2, F2-isoprostanes, endothelin-1, cysteinyl-leukotrienes
Their exact role in the pathogenesis of HRS is unclear
Investigations
Creatinine
Rapid deterioration in patients with type 1 HRS
Slower course (deteriorating over several months) in type 2 HRS
Urea
May be artificially decreased because of reduced hepatic synthesis of urea
May be increased if GI haemorrhage
Electrolytes
Low sodium due to chronic liver disease
Potassium increases as renal failure progresses
FBC
Anaemia and thrombocytopenia due to chronic liver disease
An elevated WBC count is suggestive of the presence of an infection
May be responsible for the worsening renal function
LFTs
Transaminases, gamma-GT, and Alk phos may be normal or elevated in chronic liver disease
Low albumin is an indication of impaired liver function
Coagulation study
Indication of impaired liver function
Diagnostic paracentesis and culture of ascitic fluid
Elevated WBC suggests spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, which commonly precipitates HRS
Blood culture
Positive culture suggests sepsis
Urinalysis and culture
Presence of WBC and organisms indicates a possible infective cause of worsening renal function
Presence of RBC and red cell casts suggests an intrinsic renal cause of the renal failure
e.g. glomerulonephritis
Urinary sodium is low in HRS
Due to preserved tubular function and activation of sodium-retaining systems
Should not be used as a major criterion to differentiate between HRS and acute tubular necrosis
CXR
CXR is performed to exclude sepsis
Management
a) conservative
Supportive therapy
Patients should have their fluid status, urine output, and serum electrolytes monitored closely
In particular, patients should be prevented from developing severe hyponatraemia
But rapid correction of hyponatraemia is avoided
May lead to demyelination syndrome and increased ascites formation
If tense, symptomatic ascites is present, paracentesis may temporarily improve renal function
If severe electrolyte disturbances, volume overload, or metabolic acidosis is present:
Patients are considered for continuous haemofiltration
However, limitations such as hypotension make it difficult in this patient group
Immunisation with influenza and pneumococcal vaccines is important
These patients are immunocompromised
b) medical
Terlipressin
Terlipressin (a vasopressin analogue) plus albumin is the first-line therapeutic approach for type 1 HRS
It may prolong short-term survival, and reverse type 1 HRS
Treatment should target a serum creatinine of <133 micromol/L (<1.5 mg/dL)
Fluid bolus
If renal failure is due to hypovolaemia, it will improve after fluid bolus
No improvement will occur in patients with HRS
Antibiotics
Broad-spectrum non-nephrotoxic antibiotics such as ceftriaxone should be commenced
Continue until results of cultures are known
Negative cultures and persisting renal impairment indicate HRS
Albumin
Combined treatment with albumin and antibiotics reduces the incidence of renal impairment and death
Pentoxifylline
Improves short-term survival in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis
Appears to be related to a decreased risk of developing HRS
Octreotide + midodrine + albumin
Midodrine is a vasoconstrictor, while octreotide inhibits release of endogenous vasodilators
These drugs work synergistically to improve renal haemodynamics
Usually only used as a bridging therapy until liver transplantation is available
c) surgical
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt
Used in patients without severe liver failure in whom vasoconstrictors have failed to improve renal function
High serum bilirubin, Childs-Pugh score >12, severe hepatic encephalopathy
Functions as a side-to-side portocaval shunt and serves to relieve portal hypertension
Performed under analgesia
Placement of a self-expandable metal stent between a hepatic vein and the intrahepatic portion of the portal vein
Uses a transjugular approach
Usually only used as a bridging therapy until liver transplantation is available
Liver transplantation
Liver transplantation is the only definitive treatment of HRS
The decision for transplantation of a limited resource is complex and involves severity of illness and likely prognosis
Patients with severe co-morbidities are not candidates for a liver transplant
e.g. CAD or heart failure, advanced age, alcoholism, and infection
Prognosis
Prognosis for patients with HRS is poor
Type 1 HRS has a hospital survival of less than 10%, and median survival time is 2 weeks
Type 2 HRS has a median survival time of around 6 months
The severity of underlying liver disease is a factor in the ability to recover from the renal failure
The 1-year survival for type 2 HRS is 38.5%
In patients with HRS, the 5-year survival following liver transplant is around 60%
This is significantly lower than in patients without HRS (68%)